Robust correlation coefficient goodness-of-fit test for the Gumbel distribution
Background & Aim: A single outlier can even have a large disturbing effect on a classical statistical method that is optimal under the classical assumptions. One of the powerful goodness-offit tests is the correlation coefficient test, however this test suffers from the presence of outliers.
Methods & Materials: This study provides a simple robust method for test of goodness of fit for the Gumbel distribution [extreme value distribution (EVD) type I family] through using the new diagnostic tool called the “Forward Search” (FS) method. The FS version of this test was introduce in the present study, which is not affected by the outliers.
Results: A new robust method for testing the goodness-of-fit for Gumbel distribution has been presented. The approach gives information about the distribution of majority of the data and the percentage of contamination.
Conclusion: A new robust method for testing the goodness-of-fit for the Gumbel distribution has been presented. The simple and fast method have been used to find distribution of proposed statistic. In addition, using the transformation study, an application to the two-parameter Weibull distribution has been investigated. The performance and the ability of this procedure to capture the structure of data have been illustrated by some simulation studies.
Fisher RA, Caleb Tippett LH. Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1928; 24(2): 180-90.
Filliben JJ. The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality. Technometrics 1975; 17(1): 111-7.
Kinnison R. Correlation coefficient goodness-of-fit test for the extreme-value distribution. Am Stat 1989; 43(2): 98-100.
Riani M, Atkinson AC. Robust diagnostic data analysis: Transformations in regression. Technometrics 2000; 42(4): 384-94.
Atkinson AC, Riani M. Forward search added-variable t-tests and the effect of masked outliers on model selection. Biometrika 2002; 89(4): 939-46.6. Atkinson AC, Riani M. The forward search and data visualisation. Comput Stat 2004; 19(1): 29-54.
Bertaccini B, Varriale R. Robust analysis of variance: An approach based on the forward search. Comput Stat Data Anal 2006; 51(10): 5172-83.
Coin D. Statistical methods and applications. Stat Methods Appt 2008; 17(1): 3-12.
Mahdavi A, Towhidi M. Robust tests for testing the parameters of a normal population. Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran 2014; 25(3): 273-80.
Mahdavi A, Towhidi M. Density estimation of a unimodal continuous distribution in the presence of outliers. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A:Science 2017; 1-12.
Atkinson AC, Riani M, Cerioli A. The forward search: Theory and data analysis. J Korean Stat Soc 2010; 39(2): 117-34.
D'Agostino RB. Goodness-of-fit-techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1986.
Castillo E, Hadi AS, Balakrishnan N, Sarabia JM. Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.
Rousseeuw PJ. Least median of squares regression. J Am Stat Assoc 1984; 79(388): 871-80.
Atkinson AC, Riani M. Distribution theory and simulations for tests of outliers in regression. J Comput Graph Stat 2006; 15(2): 460-76.