Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology 2016. 2(2):76-80.

Awareness and attitude towards applications of biostatistics by the healthcare professionals in their decision making in north Karnataka, India
Shivalingappa Javali, Mohan Anantarao Sunkad

Abstract


Background  & Aim: The objective  of our study was to find out the awareness, inclination  and desire to apply the biostatistics as a tool in their areas of work by healthcare professionals.
Methods   &  Materials:   A  cross-sectional   study  was  done  using  self-administered,   validated questionnaire,  among the faculty,  resident  doctors and internees  of medical  college,  physiotherapy college, dental college and nursing college. Study was done in North Karnataka, India, during 2012-13.
Results: Out of a total of 500 questionnaires  that were distributed  among participants,  only 460 questionnaires  were received with a dropout rate of 8%. The response rate was 92%. Most of the respondents believed that the biostatistics is more difficult than other subjects of medical sciences. The total mean perception of knowledge scores was 21.2 ± 4.26 and total mean attitude scores was 33.4 ± 6.78 and were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:  The study has brought out the fact that “biostatistics”  is a difficult subject, more of mathematics  and  is  best  left  to  experts.  However  the  respondents  have  felt  “biostatistics”  an important part of evidence based medicine and a necessary skill for healthcare professional.


Keywords


Knowledge; Biostatistics; Useful tool

Full Text:

PDF

References


Spiegelhalter DJ. Statistical Aids in clinical decision-making. Statistician 1982; 31(1): 19-36.

Zurakowski D, Johnson VM, Lee EY. Biostatistics in clinical decision making for cardiothoracic radiologists. J Thorac Imaging 2013; 28(6): 368-75.

Banerjee A, Jadhav SL, Bhawalkar JS. Probability, clinical decision making and hypothesis testing. Ind Psychiatry J 2009; 18(1): 64-9.

Daher AM, Amin F. Assessing the perceptions of a biostatistics and epidemiology module: Views ofYear 2 medical students from a Malaysian university. A cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 34.

Guyatt G, Rennie D, Evidence-based medicine working group. users' guides to the medical literature: A manual for evidence- based clinical practice. Chicago, IL: AMA Press; 2002.

Berwick DM, Fineberg HV, Weinstein MC. When doctors meet numbers. Am J Med 1981; 71(6): 991-8.

Khan N, Mumtaz Y. Attitude of teaching faculty towards statistics at a medical university in Karachi, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2009; 21(3): 166-71.

Wulff HR, Andersen B, Brandenhoff P, Guttler F. What do doctors know about statistics? Stat Med 1987; 6(1): 3-10.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Improving doctors' understanding of statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser A 1991; 154(2): 223-67.

Morris RW. Does EBM offer the best opportunity yet for teaching medical statistics? Stat Med 2002; 21(7): 969-77.

Shah SI. Viewpoint: pancakes and medical statistics. Acad Med 2005; 80(5): 452-4.

West CP, Ficalora RD. Clinician attitudes toward biostatistics. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82(8): 939-43.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.