Socioeconomic status of patients with pemphigus vulgaris
Abstract
Background & Aim: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) with painful blisters and erosions on skin and mucosa can significantly impair patient’s social life. There are few studies that have focused on the socioeconomic status (SES) of these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SES of newly diagnosed PV patients who were referred to our clinic.
Methods & Materials: A total of 153 patients with PV participated in this case–control study. Among them, 58 patients had the disease for < 1 year. The control group was 70 patients without immunobullous diseases who were selected from general clinic. A Persian questionnaire was used for evaluation of SES along with demographic characteristics and disease-related information.
Results: Level indicator of the family socioeconomic was 13.10 ± 6.08 (range 6-28) and 19.32 ± 6.24 (range 9-33) in the case and control groups, respectively. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (P ˂ 0.00100). There was an association between socioeconomic level and forbearing of some of their diagnostic or treatment process (P = 0.00900). Comparison between patients from urban and rural area showed that patients from rural area had significantly lower level of socioeconomic (P = 0.00698). Comparing new onset PV patients with those with disease > 1 year did not show any significant difference (P = 0.41000) .
Conclusion: SES of PV patients was significantly lower than controls, and this difference was not related to disease duration. This situation was more significant in rural patients. Hence, by recognizing these groups, we could help them more effectively.
Results: Level indicator of the family socioeconomic was 13.10 ± 6.08 (range 6-28) and 19.32 ± 6.24 (range 9-33) in the case and control groups, respectively. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (P ˂ 0.00100). There was an association between socioeconomic level and forbearing of some of their diagnostic or treatment process (P = 0.00900). Comparison between patients from urban and rural area showed that patients from rural area had significantly lower level of socioeconomic (P = 0.00698). Comparing new onset PV patients with those with disease > 1 year did not show any significant difference (P = 0.41000) .
Conclusion: SES of PV patients was significantly lower than controls, and this difference was not related to disease duration. This situation was more significant in rural patients. Hence, by recognizing these groups, we could help them more effectively.
Korman N. Pemphigus. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988; 18(6): 1219-38
Bastuji-Garin S. Acquired autoimmune bullous skin disease. In: Grob JJ, Stern R, MacKie R, Weinstock MA, Editors. Epidemiology: Causes and prevention of skin diseases. New York, NY: Wiley; 1997. p. 334-41.
Bastuji-Garin S, Turki H, Mokhtar I, Nouira R, Fazaa B, Jomaa B, et al. Possible relation of Tunisian pemphigus with traditional cosmetics: A multicenter case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155(3): 249-56. 4. Chams-Davatchi C. Prevalence and treatment of pemphigus in Iran. Dermatol Clin 2011; 29(4): 681-3.
Sebaratnam DF, McMillan JR, Werth VP, Murrell DF. Quality of life in patients with bullous dermatoses. Clin Dermatol 2012; 30(1): 103-7.
Ghodsi SZ, Chams-Davatchi C, Daneshpazhooh M, Valikhani M, Esmaili N. Quality of life and psychological status of patients with pemphigus vulgaris using Dermatology Life Quality Index and General Health Questionnaires. J Dermatol 2012; 39(2): 141-4.
Aberer E. Epidemiologic, socioeconomic and psychosocial aspects in lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2010; 19(9): 1118-24.
Kwan Z, Bong YB, Tan LL, Lim SX, Yong AS, Ch'ng CC, et al. Socioeconomic and sociocultural determinants of psychological distress and quality of life among patients with psoriasis in a selected multi-ethnic Malaysian population. Psychol Health Med 2017; 22(2): 184-95.
Vahdaninia M, Montazeri A. Socio-economic health inequalities and their indices in epidemiologic studies. Iran J Epidemiol 2006; 2(1-2): 1-6. [In Persian].
Haider A, Mamdani M, Shaw JC, Alter DA, Shear NH. Socioeconomic status influences care of patients with acne in Ontario, Canada. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54(2): 331-5.
Haghdoost AA. Complexity of the socioeconomic status and its disparity as a determinant of health. Int J Prev Med 2012; 3(2): 75-6.
Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, Fortmann SP. Socioeconomic status and health: How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health 1992; 82(6): 816-20.
Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, et al.
Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: Selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20(4): 417-35.
Garmaroudi GR, Moradi A. Socio-economic status in Iran: A study of measurement index. Payesh Health Monit 2010; 9(2): 13744. [In Persian].
Masahiro S, Shigaku I, Yutaka I, Ogawa H. An investigation of quality of life (QOL) of pemphigus patients in Japan (First report). Jpn J Dermatol 2000; 110: 283-8.
Zuijdwijk CS, Cuerden M, Mahmud FH. Social determinants of health on glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2013; 162(4): 730-5.
Briggs FB, Acuna BS, Shen L, Bellesis KH, Ramsay PP, Quach H, et al. Adverse socioeconomic position during the life course is associated with multiple sclerosis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014; 68(7): 622-9.
McKenzie SK, Carter KN, Blakely T, Ivory V. Effects of childhood socioeconomic position on subjective health and health behaviours in adulthood: How much is mediated by adult socioeconomic position? BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 269.
Mashayekhi-Ghoyonlo V, Kiafar B, Rohani M, Esmaeili H, Erfanian-Taghvaee MR. Correlation between socioeconomic status and clinical course in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Cutan Med Surg 2015; 19(1): 40-4.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 3 No 1 (2017) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
Keywords | ||
Pemphigus vulgaris Socioeconomic status Quality of life |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |