Socio-economic status of individuals in Tehran University of Medical Sciences employees` cohort study using PCA, MCA and FAMD methods
,
Abstract
Introduction: Determining socio-economic status (SES) can greatly help decision makers in the field of social health. Because SES can play an important role in accessing medical services or welfare amenities. We aimed to determine SES using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) and Factor Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD) methods.
Methods & Materials: In this cross-sectional study (2023), 4448 employees aged 19 to 75 years were included to the study from Tehran University of Medical Sciences employees` cohort (TEC). Demographic variables and socio-economic factors were considered. Considering the weaknesses of PCA and MCA methods, we calculated the SES score using PCA, MCA and FAMD methods, and the percentile of people was determined. These weaknesses include normality assumption and considering only linear relationship for PCA, inability to interpret the relationships between variables and considering each level of classification variables as a new variable for MCA
Results: We studied 4448 people (39.3% men) with a mean age of 42.3 and a standard deviation of 8.7. The correlation between the percentiles obtained through PCA, MCA and FAMD methods was very high, and the highest correlation was related to the percentiles obtained through PCA and FAMD methods with a value of 0.994. The intraclass correlation coefficient value was 0.996. Also, this value was 0.996 and 0.994 in the random samples of 250 and 100 individuals from the original data, respectively.
Conclusion: All of the three methods worked similarly on determining the SES and calculating the percentile of people. PCA and FAMD methods had better agreement than others. Therefore, in studies that have both quantitative and qualitative variables, the choice of analysis method depends on the opinion of the researcher.
Keywords: Socio-economic status, Principal Component Analysis, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Factor Analysis of Mixed Data, cohort study
1. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics: pearson Boston, MA; 2013.
2. Ouyang Y. Evaluation of river water 515Vol 9 No 4 (2023). Socio-Economic Status of Individuals in Tehran University ... Ramezanzadeh Tabriz F et al. quality monitoring stations by principal component analysis. Water research.
2005;39(12):2621-35. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.024.
3. NOURI RE, Ashrafi K, Azhdarpour AA. Comparison of ANN and PCA based multivariate linear regression applied to predict the daily average concentration of CO: A case study of Tehran.
4. Ranjbaran M, Soori H, Etemad K, Khodadost MJJoJUoMS. Relationship between socioeconomic status and health status and application of principal component analysis. 2015;1(1):9-19.
5. Audigier V, Husson F, Josse J. A principal component method to impute missing values for mixed data. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification. 2016;10(1):5-26. doi.org/10.1007/s11634-014-0195-1.
6. Wold HJMa. Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. 1966:391-420.
7. Bertrand F, Maumy M, Fussler L, Kobes N, Savary S, Grosman JJCSIB, Industry, et al. Using factor analyses to explore data generated by the National Grapevine Wood Diseases survey. 2007;1(2):183-202.
8. Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TLJIjot. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. 2005;5(2):159-68.
9. Bobak CA, Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ. Estimation of an inter-rater intra-class correlation coefficient that overcomes common
assumption violations in the assessment of health measurement scales. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1):93. doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0550-6.
10. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2010;19(4):539-49. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
11. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. 2012.
12. Jacoby WG. Loess:: a nonparametric, graphical tool for depicting relationships between variables. Electoral Studies.
2000;19(4):5
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 9 No 4 (2023) | |
| Section | Articles | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v9i4.16674 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Socio-economic status PCA MCA FAMD cohort study | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
