Assessing Malaria using Neutral Zone Classifiers with Mixture Discriminant Analysis on 2D Images of Red Blood Cells

  • Shariq Mohammed Mail Department of Statistics,College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
  • Dipak Kumar Dey Department of Statistics,College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
Keywords:
cell segmentation, conditional misclassification rates, feature extraction, receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, specificity

Abstract

Background and Aim: We aim to build a classifier to distinguish between malaria-infected red blood cells (RBCs) and healthy cells using the two-dimensional (2D) microscopic images of RBCs. We demonstrate the process of cell segmentation and feature extraction from the 2D images.

Methods and Materials: We describe an approach to address the problem using mixture discriminant analysis (MDA) on the 2D image profiles of the RBCs. The extracted features are used with Gaussian MDA to distinguish between healthy and malaria infected cells. We also use the neutral zone classifiers where ambiguous cases are identified separately by the classifier.

Results: We compare the classification results from the regular classifiers such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA) or MDA and the methods where neutral zone classifiers are used. We see that including the neutral zone improves the classification results by controlling the false positive and false negatives. The number of misclassifications are seen to be lower than the case without neutral zone classifiers.

Conclusion: This paper presents an alternative approach for classification by incorporating neutral zone classifier approach, where a prediction is not made for the ambiguous cases. From the data analysis we see that this approach based on neutral zone classifiers presents a useful alternative in classification problems for various applications.

References

1. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2015. World Health Organization; 2016 Jan 30.
2. Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1996 Jan;58(1):155-76.
3. Schmid U, Roesch P, Krause M, Harz M, Popp J, Baumann K. Gaussian mixture discriminant analysis for the single-cell differentiation of bacteria using micro-Raman spectroscopy.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2009 Apr 15;96(2):159-71.
4. Choi SW, Park JH, Lee IB. Process monitoring using a Gaussian mixture model via principal component analysis and discriminant analysis. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2004 Jul 15;28(8):1377-87.
5. Haeb-Umbach R, Geller D, Ney H. Improvements in connected digit recognition using linear discriminant analysis and mixture densities. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1993 Apr 27 (Vol. 2, pp. 239-242). IEEE.
6. Harris G, Andreasen NC, Cizadlo T, Bailey JM, Bockholt HJ, Magnotta VA, Arndt S. Improving tissue classification in MRI: a three-dimensional multispectral discriminant analysis method with automated training class selection. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1999 Jan 1;23(1):144-54.
7. Bacus JW. Method of and an apparatus for automatic classification of red blood cells. United States Patent US 4,097,845. 1978 Jun 27.
8. Tomari R, Zakaria WN, Jamil MM, Nor FM, Fuad NF. Computer aided system for red blood cell classification in blood smear image. Procedia Computer Science. 2014 Jan 1;42:206-13.
9. Jeske DR, Liu Z, Bent E, Borneman J. Classification rules that include neutral zones and their application to microbial community profiling. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods. 2007 Aug 7;36(10):1965-80.
10. Jeske DR, Smith S. Maximizing the usefulness of statistical classifiers for two populations with illustrative applications. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2018 Aug;27(8):2344-58.
11. Fraley C, Raftery AE. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2002 Jun 1;97(458):611-31.
12. Scrucca L, Fop M, Murphy TB, Raftery AE. mclust 5: clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal. 2016 Aug;8(1):289.
13. Fraley C, Raftery AE. How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via modelbased cluster analysis. The Computer Journal. 1998 Jan 1;41(8):578-88.
14. Biernacki C, Celeux G, Govaert G. Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated completed likelihood. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2000 Jul;22(7):719-25.
15. McLachlan GJ, Rathnayake S. On the number of components in a Gaussian mixture model. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2014 Sep;4(5):34155.
16. Anand A, Chhaniwal VK, Patel NR, Javidi B. Automatic identification of malaria-infected RBC with digital holographic microscopy using correlation algorithms. IEEE Photonics Journal. 2012 Oct;4(5):1456-64.
17. Wheeler BS, Rebecca M. Exploring Medical Language: A Student-Directed Approach. Journal of Health Occupations Education. 1989;4(2):9.
Published
2019-11-10
How to Cite
1.
Mohammed S, Dey D. Assessing Malaria using Neutral Zone Classifiers with Mixture Discriminant Analysis on 2D Images of Red Blood Cells. jbe. 5(1):1-11.
Section
Original Article(s)