Original Article

Use of Bayesian Mixture Models in Analyzing Heterogeneous Survival Data: A Simulation Study

Abstract

Background and Aim: One of the statistical methods used to analyze the time-to-event medical data is survival analysis. In survival models, the response variable is time to the occurrence of an event. The main characteristic of survival data is the existence of censored data. When we have the distribution of survival time, we can use parametric methods. Among the important and popular distributions that can be used, we can mention the Weibull distribution. If the data derives from a heterogeneous population, simple parametric models (such as Weibull) would not fit the data appropriately. One of the methods which have been introduced to overcome this problem is the use of mixture models.
Methods: To assess the validity of the two-component Weibull mixture model, we use a simulation method on heterogeneous survival data. For this purpose, data with different sample sizes were produced in a batch of 1000. Then, the validity of the model is checked using root mean square error (RMSE) criterion
Results: It is obtained that increasing the sample size would decrease the RMSE in the parameters. However the maximum observed RMSE in all the parameters was negligible.
Conclusion: The Bayesian Weibull mixture model was a proper fit for the heterogeneous survival data.

1. Kleinbaum D, Klein M. Survival analysis: a self-learning text, Springer Science & Business Media. 2006.
2. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American statistical association. 1958;53(282):457-81.
3. Cox DR, Snell EJ. A general definition of residuals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1968:248-75.
4. Baghestani A, Moghaddam S, Majd H, Akbari M, Nafissi N, Gohari K. Survival analysis of
patients with breast cancer using weibull parametric model. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8567-71.
5. Erişoğlu Ü, Erişoğlu M, Erol H. Mixture model approach to the analysis of heterogeneous survival time data. Pakistan Journal of Statistics. 2012;28(1):115-30.
6. Erisoglu U, Erisoglu M. L-moments estimations for the mixture of Weibull distributions. Journal of data science. 2014;12:69-85.
7. Berkson J, Gage RP. Survival curve for cancer patients following treatment. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1952;47(259):501-15.
8. Chen W-C, Hill B, Greenhouse J, Fayos J. Bayesian analysis of survival curves for cancer patients following treatment. Bayesian statistics. 1985;2:299-328.
9. Qian J. A Bayesian Weibull survival model: Duke University; 1994.
10. Marin J, Rodriguez-Bernal M, Wiper M. Using weibull mixture distributions to model heterogeneous survival data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 2005;34(3):673-84.
11. Erişoğlu Ü, Erol H. Modeling heterogeneous survival data using mixture of extended exponential-geometric distributions. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 2010;39(10):1939-52.
12. Karakoca A, Erisoglu U, Erisoglu M. A comparison of the parameter estimation methods
for bimodal mixture Weibull distribution with complete data. Journal of Applied Statistics. 2015;42(7):1472-89.
13. Ali S, Aslam M, Ali M. Heterogeneous data analysis using a mixture of Laplace models with conjugate priors. International Journal of Systems Science. 2014;45(12):2619-36.
14. Haq A, Al-Omari AI. Bayes estimation and prediction of a three component mixture of Rayleigh distribution under type-I censoring. Investigación Operacional. 2016;37(1):22-37
Files
IssueVol 5 No 2 (2019) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v5i2.2340
Keywords
Bayesian mixture model Survival analysis Survival models Weibull mixture RMSE

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Ahmadi N, Shirazi S, Baziyad H. Use of Bayesian Mixture Models in Analyzing Heterogeneous Survival Data: A Simulation Study. JBE. 2020;5(2):105-109.