Original Article

Combining Multiple Imputation and Inverse-Probability Weighting for Analyzing Response with Missing in the Presence of Covariates

Abstract

Introduction: Missing values are frequently seen in data sets of research studiesespecially in medical studies.Therefore, it is essential that the data, especially in medical research should evaluate in terms of the structure of missingness.This study aims to provide new statistical methods for analyzing such data.
Methods:Multiple imputation (MI) and inverse-probability weighting (IPW)aretwo common methods whichused to deal with missing data. MI method is more effectiveand complexthan IPW.MI requires a model for the joint distribution of the missing data given the observed data.While IPW need only a model for the probability that a subject has fulldata .Inefficacy in each of these models may causeto serious bias if missingness in dataset is large .Anothermethod that combines these approaches to give a doubly robust estimator.In addition, using of these methodswill demonstrate in the clinical trial data related to postpartum bleeding.
Results:In this article, we examine the performance of IPW/MI relative to MI and IPW alone in terms of bias and efficiency.According to the results of simulation can be said that that IPW/MI have advantages over alternatives.Also results of real data showed that,results of MI/MI doesnot differ with the results of IPW/MIsignificantly.
Conclusion:Problem of missing data are in many studies that causes bias and decreasing efficacy inmodel.In this study, after comparing the results of these techniques,it was concludedthat IPW/MI method has better performance than other methods.

1.Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nded.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
2.Yang X, Li J, Shoptaw S. Imputation-basedstrategies for clinical trial longitudinal datawithnonignorable missing values. Statisticalin Medicine 2008; 27(15): 2826-49.
3.Peisong H (2015), Combining Inverse Probability Weighting and Multiple Imputation to Improve Robustness of Estimation, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Vol. 43: 246 –260.
4.Rhian M. Daniel, Michael G. Kenward, A method for increasing the robustness of multiple imputation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Volume 56, Issue 6, June 2012,1624–1643.
5.Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Longitudinal dataanalysis. New York: Wiley; 2006.
6.Seaman, S. R, White, I. R, Copas, A. J., Li, L. (2012). Combining multiple imputation and inverseprobability weighting. Biometrics 68:129–137.
7.Fitzmaurice GM, Davidian M, VerbekeG,Molenberghs G. Longitudinal Data Analysis.Chapman& Hall/CRC: 2009.
8.Chiu-Hsieh Hsuab,Yisheng L(2014), A Nonparametric Multiple Imputation Approach for Data with Missing Covariate Values with Application to Colorectal Adenoma Data, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics.
9.Robins, J. and Wang, N. (2000). Inference for imputation estimators.Biometrika 87, 113–24.
10.Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH.Applied longitudinal analysis. Wiley IEEE:2004.
11.Daniels MJ, Hogan JW. Missing data inlongitudinal studies. London: Chapman &Hall; 2008.
12.Lipsitz SR, Fitzmaurice JG, Ibrahim M,Sinha DM, ParzenLipshultz S. Joint generalized estimating equations for multivariatelongitudinal binary outcomes with missingdata: an application to acquired immunedeficiency syndrome data. J Roy Statist SocSer A 2009;1:3-20.
13.Seaman, S. R., White, I. R. (2013). Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missingdata. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 22:278–295.
14.Rubin, DB. Multiple Imputation forNonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley;1987.
15.Shaun R. Seaman, Ian R. White, Combining Multiple Imputation and Inverse-Probability Weighting, Biometrics 68, 129–137, March 2012.
16.Gelman, A, Carlin, J. B, Stern, H. S, and Rubin, D. B. Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC,2004.
17.Osmani F, Hajizadeh E, Mansoori P. Use of Smoothing Methods for Estimating the Coefficients of Time Dependent Rate Models in Survival Analysis and its Application in Psoriasis Disease. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology. 2016 Oct 15;12(3):36-46.
18.Molenberghs G, Beunckens C, Sotto C,Kenward MG. Every missingness not at random model has a missingness at random counterpart with equal fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B. 2008;70(2): 371-88.
19.Schafer, J. L,Multiple imputation in multivariate problemswhen the imputation and analysis models differ. StatisticaNeerlandica. (2003), 57, 19–35.
20.Vansteelandt, S, Carpenter, J., and Kenward, M. G. Analysisof incomplete data using inverse probability weighting and doublyrobustestimators.Methodology 6,2010,37–48.
21.Robins, J. M. and Gill, R. Non-response models for theanalysis of non-monotone ignorable missing data. Statistics inMedicine 16,1997, 39–56.
22.Shaun R. Seaman, Ian R. White, Combining Multiple Imputation and Inverse-Probability Weighting, Biometrics 68,2012, 129–137.
Files
IssueVol 5 No 4 (2019) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v5i4.3869
Keywords
Multiple Imputation Inverse-Probability Weighting missingness

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Osmani F, Hajizadeh E. Combining Multiple Imputation and Inverse-Probability Weighting for Analyzing Response with Missing in the Presence of Covariates. JBE. 2020;5(4):289-297.