Review Article

Erythropoietin in COVID-19-Induced Neuroinflammation; EPO Plus Losartan Might be Promising

Abstract

Introduction: Neuroinflammation is the inflammatory reaction in the central nervous system (CNS) provoked by diverse insults. This phenomenon results in a cascade of release of inflammatory mediators and intracellular messengers such as reactive oxygen species. The elicited responses are the cause of many neurological and neurodegenerative disorders. Erythropoietin (EPO) has been considered effective in attenuating this inflammatory process in the CNS, yet its administration in COVID-19 needs meticulously designed studies.
Discussion: Neuroinflammation in COVID-19 due to probable contribution of renin-angiotensin system dysregulation resulting in surplus of Ang II and owing to the synergistic interaction between this octapeptide and EPO needs special consideration. Both of these compounds increase intracellular Ca2+ which may induce release of cytokine and inflammatory mediators leading to aggravation of neuroinflammation. In addition, Ang II elevates HIF even in normoxia which by itself increases EPO. It is implicated that EPO and HIF may likely increase in patients with COVID-19 which makes administration of EPO to these patients hazardous. Furthermore, papain-like protease of SARS-CoV2 as a deubiquitinase may also increase HIF.
Conclusion: It is hypothesized that administration of EPO to patients with COVID-19-induced neuroinflammation may not be safe and in case EPO is needed for any reason in this disease adding of losartan may block AT1R-mediated post-receptor harmful effects of Ang II in synergism with EPO. Inhibition of papain-like protease might additionally decrease HIF in this disease. More in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies are needed to validate these hypotheses.

1. DiSabato, D.J., N. Quan, and J.P. Godbout, Neuroinflammation: the devil is in the details. Journal of neurochemistry, 2016. 139: p. 136-153.
2. Sochocka, M., B.S. Diniz, and J. Leszek,Inflammatory response in the CNS: friend or foe? Molecular neurobiology, 2017. 54(10): p. 8071-8089.
3. Shastri, A., D.M. Bonifati, and U. Kishore, Innate immunity and neuroinflammation. Mediators of inflammation, 2013. 2013.
4.Ratter, J.M., et al., Proinflammatory effects of hypoglycemia in humans with or without diabetes. Diabetes, 2017. 66(4): p. 1052- 1061.
5.Fang, M., et al., Effect of Inflammation on the Process of Stroke Rehabilitation and poststroke depression. Frontiers in
Psychiatry, 2019. 10.
6.Liu, R., et al., Role of neuroinflammation in ischemic stroke. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation, 2017. 4: p. 158-66.
7.Tschoe, C., et al., Neuroinflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage and potential therapeutic targets. Journal of stroke, 2020.22(1): p. 29.
8.Mracsko, E. and R. Veltkamp, Neuroinflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2014. 8: p. 388.
9.Wofford, K.L., D.J. Loane, and D.K. Cullen, Acute drivers of neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury. Neural regeneration research, 2019. 14(9): p. 1481.
10.Dinet, V., K.G. Petry, and J. Badaut, Brain-immune interactions and neuroinflammation after traumatic brain
injury. Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. 13: p.1178.
11.Hensley, K., Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: mechanisms, pathologic consequences, and potential for therapeutic manipulation. Journal of Alzheimer's disease, 2010. 21(1): p. 1-14.
12.Calsolaro, V. and P. Edison, Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: current evidence and future directions.
Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2016. 12(6): p. 719-732.
13.Millington, C., et al., Chronic neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: new perspectives on animal models and
promising candidate drugs. BioMed research international, 2014. 2014.
14.Wang, Q., Y. Liu, and J. Zhou, Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease and its potential as therapeutic target.
Translational Neurodegeneration, 2015. 4(1): p. 19.
15.Gelders, G., V. Baekelandt, and A. Van der Perren, Linking neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of immunology research, 2018. 2018.
16.Liu, J. and F. Wang, Role of neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cellular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Frontiers in Immunology, 2017. 8: p. 1005.
17.Koudriavtseva, T. and C. Mainero, Neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration and regeneration in multiple sclerosis:
intercorrelated manifestations of the immune response. Neural regeneration research, 2016. 11(11): p. 1727.
18.Al-Badri, G. and A. Castorina, Insights into the Role of Neuroinflammation in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 2018. 3(1): p. 13.
19.Vezzani, A., Epilepsy and Inflammation in the Brain: Overview and Pathophysiology: Epilepsy and Inflammation in the Brain. Epilepsy currents, 2014. 14(2_suppl): p. 3-7.
20.Jeon, S.W. and Y.K. Kim, Neuroinflammation and cytokine abnormality in major depression: cause or consequence in that illness? World journal of psychiatry, 2016. 6(3): p. 283.
21.Troubat, R., et al., Neuroinflammation and depression: A review. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2020.
22.Gerentes, M., et al., ObsessiveCompulsive Disorder: Autoimmunity and Neuroinflammation. Current psychiatry
reports, 2019. 21(8): p. 78.
23.Aricioglu, F., et al., Neuroinflammation in schizophrenia: a critical review and the future. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji BülteniBulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2016. 26(4): p. 429-437.
24.Shin, T., et al., Erythropoietin and autoimmune neuroinflammation: lessons from experimental autoimmune
encephalomyelitis and experimental autoimmune neuritis. Anatomy & cell biology, 2012. 45(4): p. 215-220.
25.Moransard, M., et al., Erythropoietin reduces experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis severity via
neuroprotective mechanisms. Journal of neuroinflammation, 2017. 14(1): p. 202.
26.Chong, Z.Z., J.-Q. Kang, and K. Maiese, Apaf-1, Bcl-xL, cytochrome c, and caspase-9 form the critical elements for cerebral vascular protection by erythropoietin. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2003.23(3): p. 320-330.
27.Liu, W.-C., et al., Therapeutic effect of erythropoietin in patients with traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of neurosurgery, 2016. 127(1): p. 8-15.
28.Nirula, R., et al., Safety and efficacy of erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury patients: a pilot randomized trial. Critical care research and practice, 2010. 2010.
29.Ehrenreich, H., et al., Erythropoietin therapy for acute stroke is both safe and beneficial. Molecular medicine, 2002. 8(8): p. 495-505.
30.Tang, Y.-D., H.M. Rinder, and S.D. Katz, Effects of recombinant human erythropoietin on antiplatelet action of aspirin and clopidogrel in healthy subjects: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. American heart journal, 2007. 154(3): p. 494. e1-494. e7.
31.Demetz, G., et al., The influence of Erythropoietin on platelet activation, thrombin generation and FVII/active FVII in
patients with AMI. Thrombosis journal, 2014. 12(1): p. 18.
32.Tobu, M., et al., Erythropoietin-induced thrombosis as a result of increased inflammation and thrombin activatable
fibrinolytic inhibitor. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis, 2004. 10(3): p. 225-232.
33.Agarwal, R., Mechanisms and mediators of hypertension induced by erythropoietin and related molecules. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2018. 33(10): p. 1690-1698.
34.Nejat, R., et al., Daily Low Dose of Erythropoietin in Neuroinflammation; EPO Might Be Hazardous in COVID-19. 2020:
preprints.org. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202006.0107.v1
35.Yatsiv, I., et al., Erythropoietin is neuroprotective, improves functional recovery, and reduces neuronal apoptosis and
inflammation in a rodent model of experimental closed head injury. The FASEB journal, 2005. 19(12): p. 1701-1703.
36.Banjara, M. and C. Ghosh, Sterile neuroinflammation and strategies for therapeutic intervention. International
journal of inflammation, 2017. 2017.
37.Noctor, S.C., et al., Neurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex. Nature, 2001. 409(6821): p. 714-720.
38.Barry, D.S., J.M. Pakan, and K.W. McDermott, Radial glial cells: key organisers in CNS development. The international
journal of biochemistry & cell biology, 2014. 46: p. 76-79.
39.Lima, C.M.d., et al., Differential change in hippocampal radial astrocytes and neurogenesis in shorebirds with contrasting migratory routes. Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2019. 13: p. 82.
40.Cho, H., et al., Differential innate immune response programs in neuronal subtypes determine susceptibility to infection in the brain by positive-stranded RNA viruses. Nature medicine, 2013. 19(4): p. 458.
41.Ising, C. and M.T. Heneka, Functional and structural damage of neurons by innate immune mechanisms during
neurodegeneration. Cell death & disease, 2018. 9(2): p. 1-8.
42.Ma, Y., et al., TLR8: an innate immune receptor in brain, neurons and axons. Cell Cycle, 2007. 6(23): p. 2859-2868.
43.González-Reyes, R.E. and M.G. Rubiano, Astrocyte´ s RAGE: More than just a question of mood. Central Nervous System Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (Formerly Current Medicinal Chemistry-Central Nervous System Agents), 2018. 18(1): p. 39-48.
44.Kigerl, K.A., et al., Pattern recognition receptors and central nervous system repair. Experimental neurology, 2014. 258: p. 5-16.
45.Kong, Y. and Y. Le, Toll-like receptors in inflammation of the central nervous system. International immunopharmacology, 2011. 11(10): p. 1407-1414.
46.Peltier, D.C., et al., Human neuronal cells possess functional cytoplasmic and TLRmediated innate immune pathways
influenced by phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase signaling. The Journal of Immunology, 2010. 184(12): p. 7010-7021.
47.Canton, J., D. Neculai, and S. Grinstein, Scavenger receptors in homeostasis and immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology, 2013. 13(9): p. 621-634.
48.Vorup-Jensen, T. and R.K. Jensen, Structural immunology of complement receptors 3 and 4. Frontiers in immunology,
2018. 9: p. 2716.
49.Jahagirdar, P., et al., Mannose Receptor and Targeting Strategies, in Targeted intracellular drug delivery by receptor
mediated endocytosis. 2019, Springer. p. 433-456.
50.Ransohoff, R.M. and M.A. Brown, Innate immunity in the central nervous system. The Journal of clinical investigation, 2012. 122(4): p. 1164-1171.
51.Liu, T., et al., NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2017. 2(1): p. 1-9.
52.Rui, W., et al., PM2. 5‐induced oxidative stress increases adhesion molecules expression in human endothelial cells
through the ERK/AKT/NF‐κB‐dependent pathway. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 2016. 36(1): p. 48-59.
53.Sun, B., et al., Activation of NF κ B and Expression of ICAM-1 in Ischemic– reperfused Canine Myocardium. Journal of
molecular and cellular cardiology, 2001. 33(1): p. 109-119.
54.Milstone, D.S., et al., Differential role of an NF-κB transcriptional response element in endothelial versus intimal cell VCAM-1 expression. Circulation research, 2015. 117(2): p. 166-177.
55.Singh, S.S., et al., NF-κB-Mediated Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease and Potential Therapeutic Effect of
Polyphenols. Neurotoxicity Research, 2019: p. 1-17.
56.Ju Hwang, C., et al., NF-ΚB as a Key Mediator of Brain Inflammation in Alzheimer's Disease. CNS & Neurological
Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-CNS & Neurological Disorders), 2019. 18(1): p. 3-10.
57.Flood, P.M., et al., Transcriptional factor NF-κB as a target for therapy in Parkinson's disease. Parkinson's disease, 2011. 2011.
58.Jones, S.V. and I. Kounatidis, Nuclear factor-kappa B and Alzheimer disease, unifying genetic and environmental risk
factors from cell to humans. Frontiers in immunology, 2017. 8: p. 1805.
59.Li, Y., O. Sibon, and P. Dijkers, Inhibition of NF-κB in astrocytes is sufficient to delay neurodegeneration induced by proteotoxicity in neurons. Journal of neuroinflammation, 2018. 15(1): p. 261.
60.Ridder, D. and M. Schwaninger, NF-κB signaling in cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience, 2009. 158(3): p. 995-1006.
61.Theus, M.H., et al., Loss of NLRX1 exacerbates neural tissue damage and NF-κB signaling following brain injury. The Journal of Immunology, 2017. 199(10): p. 3547-3558.
62.Bertheloot, D. and E. Latz, HMGB1, IL1α, IL-33 and S100 proteins: dual-function alarmins. Cellular & molecular immunology, 2017. 14(1): p. 43-64.
63.Xu, J., et al., Microglial activation induced by the alarmin S100B is regulated by poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase‐1. Glia, 2016.64(11): p. 1869-1878.
64.Shih, R.-H., C.-Y. Wang, and C.-M. Yang, NF-kappaB signaling pathways in neurological inflammation: a mini review.
Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2015. 8: p. 77.
65.Hollborn, M., et al., Positive feedback regulation between MMP-9 and VEGF in human RPE cells. Investigative
ophthalmology & visual science, 2007.48(9): p. 4360-4367.
66.McGeehan, G.M., et al., Regulation of tumour necrosis factor-α processing by a metalloproteinase inhibitor. Nature, 1994. 370(6490): p. 558-561.
67.Cox, J.H. and C.M. Overall, Cytokine substrates: MMP regulation of inflammatory signaling molecules, in The Cancer
Degradome. 2008, Springer. p. 519-539.
68.Arpino, V., M. Brock, and S.E. Gill, The role of TIMPs in regulation of extracellular matrix proteolysis. Matrix Biology, 2015. 44: p. 247-254.
69.Meli, R., C. Pirozzi, and A. Pelagalli, New perspectives on the potential role of aquaporins (AQPs) in the physiology of
inflammation. Frontiers in physiology, 2018.9: p. 101.
70.Tourdias, T., et al., Differential aquaporin 4 expression during edema build-up and resolution phases of brain inflammation. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 2011. 8(1): p. 143.
71.Van Hoecke, M., et al., Evidence of HIF1 functional binding activity to caspase-3 promoter after photothrombotic cerebral ischemia. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, 2007. 34(1): p. 40-47.
72.Chandel, N.S., et al., Reactive oxygen species generated at mitochondrial complex III stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor-1α during hypoxia a mechanism of O2 sensing. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2000. 275(33): p. 25130-25138.
73.Klimova, T. and N. Chandel, Mitochondrial complex III regulates hypoxic activation of HIF. Cell Death &
Differentiation, 2008. 15(4): p. 660-666.
74.Haibara, A.S., N.M. Sharma, and K.P. Patel, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1 Alpha Expression Induced by
Proinflammatory Cytokines in NG108-15 Neuronal Cells. The FASEB Journal, 2016. 30(1_supplement): p. 1234.3-1234.3.
75.Otto, T. and J. Fandrey, Thyroid hormone induces hypoxia-inducible factor 1α gene expression through thyroid hormone receptor β/retinoid x receptor α-dependent activation of hepatic leukemia factor. Endocrinology, 2008. 149(5): p. 2241-2250.
76.Qutub, A.A. and A.S. Popel, Reactive oxygen species regulate hypoxia-inducible factor 1α differentially in cancer and
ischemia. Molecular and cellular biology,2008. 28(16): p. 5106-5119.
77.Gorlach, A., et al., Thrombin activates the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 signaling pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells: role of the p22 phox-containing NADPH oxidase. Circulation research, 2001. 89(1): p. 47-54.
78.Feldser, D., et al., Reciprocal positive regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and insulin-like growth factor 2. Cancer research, 1999. 59(16): p. 3915-3918.
79.Jiang, F., et al., The role of insulin-like growth factor I and hypoxia inducible factor 1α in vascular endothelial growth factor expression in type 2 diabetes. Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science, 2013. 43(1): p. 37-44.
80.Yoshida, T., et al., Transcriptional upregulation of HIF-1 α by NF-κ B/p65 and its associations with β-catenin/p300 complexes in endometrial carcinoma cells. Laboratory investigation, 2013. 93(11): p.1184-1193.
81.Barteczek, P., et al., Neuronal HIF-1α and HIF-2α deficiency improves neuronal survival and sensorimotor function in the early acute phase after ischemic stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2017. 37(1): p. 291-306.
82.Chen, W., et al., Prodeath or prosurvival: two facets of hypoxia inducible factor-1 in perinatal brain injury. Experimental neurology, 2009. 216(1): p. 7-15.
83.Gawad, A., et al., Antiapoptotic properties of erythropoietin: novel strategies for protection of retinal pigment epithelial cells. Eye, 2009. 23(12): p. 2245-2250.
84.Alural, B., et al., EPO mediates neurotrophic, neuroprotective, anti-oxidant, and anti-apoptotic effects via downregulation of miR-451 and miR-885-5p in SH-SY5Y neuron-like cells. Frontiers in immunology, 2014. 5: p. 475.
85.MacRedmond, R., G.K. Singhera, and D.R. Dorscheid, Erythropoietin inhibits respiratory epithelial cell apoptosis in a
model of acute lung injury. European Respiratory Journal, 2009. 33(6): p. 1403-1414.
86.Olsen, N.V., Central nervous system frontiers for the use of erythropoietin. Clinical infectious diseases, 2003.
37(Supplement_4): p. S323-S330.
87.Nejat, R., Neuroprotective Effect of Erythropoietin. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health & Human Resilience, 2018. 20: p. 21.
88.Banks, W.A., et al., Passage of erythropoietic agents across the blood–brain barrier: a comparison of human and murine erythropoietin and the analog darbepoetin alfa. European journal of pharmacology, 2004. 505(1-3): p. 93-101.
89.Brines, M.L., et al., Erythropoietin crosses the blood–brain barrier to protect against experimental brain injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000. 97(19): p. 10526-10531.
90.Nagai, A., et al., Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptors in human CNS neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and
oligodendrocytes grown in culture. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 2001. 60(4): p. 386-392.
91. Noguchi, C.T., et al., Role of erythropoietin in the brain. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2007. 64(2): p. 159-
171.
92.Alnaeeli, M., et al., Erythropoietin in brain development and beyond. Anatomy research international, 2012. 2012.
93.Hassouna, I., et al., Revisiting adult neurogenesis and the role of erythropoietin for neuronal and oligodendroglial
differentiation in the hippocampus. Molecular psychiatry, 2016. 21(12): p. 1752-1767.
94.Wang, L., et al., Treatment of stroke with erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis and improves neurological function in rats. Stroke, 2004. 35(7): p. 1732-1737.
95.Thériault, P., et al., Sub-acute systemic erythropoietin administration reduces ischemic brain injury in an age-dependent manner. Oncotarget, 2016. 7(24): p. 35552.
96.Souvenir, R., et al., Erythropoietin inhibits HIF-1α expression via upregulation of PHD2 transcription and translation in an in vitro model of hypoxia–ischemia. Translational stroke research, 2014. 5(1): p. 118-127.
97.Hellewell, S.C., et al., Erythropoietin improves motor and cognitive deficit, axonal pathology, and neuroinflammation in a combined model of diffuse traumatic brain injury and hypoxia, in association with upregulation of the erythropoietin receptor. Journal of neuroinflammation, 2013. 10(1): p. 1-21.
98.Wang, Y., et al., Erythropoietin (EPO) protects against high glucose-induced apoptosis in retinal ganglional cells. Cell
biochemistry and biophysics, 2015. 71(2): p. 749-755.
99.Singhal, N., et al., Erythropoietin upregulates brain hemoglobin expression and supports neuronal mitochondrial activity. Molecular neurobiology, 2018. 55(10): p. 8051-8058.
100.Weishaupt, J.H., et al., Effect of erythropoietin axotomy-induced apoptosis in rat retinal ganglion cells. Investigative
ophthalmology & visual science, 2004. 45(5): p. 1514-1522.
101.Digicaylioglu, M. and S.A. Lipton, Erythropoietin-mediated neuroprotection involves cross-talk between Jak2 and NF-κ B signalling cascades. Nature, 2001. 412(6847): p. 641-647.
102.Zhang, F., et al., Signal transducers and activators of transcription 5 contributes to erythropoietin-mediated neuroprotection against hippocampal neuronal death after transient global cerebral ischemia. Neurobiology of disease, 2007. 25(1): p. 45-53.
103.Liao, Z., et al., Erythropoietin can promote survival of cerebral cells by downregulating Bax gene after traumatic
brain injury in rats. Neurology India, 2009.57(6): p. 722.
104.Sekiguchi, N., et al., Effect of erythropoietin on endothelial cell apoptosis induced by high glucose. Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2004. 66: p. S103-S107.
105.Wenker, S.D., et al., Protective action of erythropoietin on neuronal damage induced by activated microglia. The FEBS journal, 2013. 280(7): p. 1630-1642.
106.Pathipati, P. and D.M. Ferriero, The differential effects of erythropoietin exposure to oxidative stress on microglia and astrocytes in vitro. Developmental neuroscience, 2017. 39(1-4): p. 310-322.
107.Tang, G. and G.-Y. Yang, Aquaporin-4: A potential therapeutic target for cerebral edema. International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. 17(10): p. 1413.
108.Souvenir, R., et al., Janus kinase 2 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 mediate the protective effects of erythropoietin in in-vitro model of hypoxia ischemia. 2009, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
109.Cravedi, P., et al., Immunosuppressive effects of erythropoietin on human alloreactive T cells. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2014. 25(9): p. 2003-2015.
110.Nairz, M., et al., The pleiotropic effects of erythropoietin in infection and inflammation. Microbes and infection, 2012. 14(3): p. 238-246.
111.Chousterman, B.G. and M. Arnaud, Is there a role for hematopoietic growth factors during sepsis? Frontiers in Immunology, 2018. 9: p. 1015.
112.Kandasamy, K., et al., Erythropoietin reverses sepsis-induced vasoplegia to norepinephrine through preservation of α1Dadrenoceptor mRNA expression and inhibition of GRK2-mediated desensitization in mouse aorta. Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics, 2016. 21(1):p. 100-113.
113.Hadadi, A., et al., Does recombinant human erythropoietin administration in critically ill COVID‐19 patients have
miraculous therapeutic effects? Journal of Medical Virology, 2020.
114.Ehrenreich, H., et al., Erythropoietin as candidate for supportive treatment of severe COVID-19. Molecular Medicine, 2020.26(1): p. 1-9.
115.Nejat, R. and A.S. Sadr, Are losartan and Imatinib Effective Against SARS-CoV2 Pathogenesis? A Pathophysiologic-Based in Silico Study. chemRxiv. preprint, 2020. DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.12271865.v1
116.Miesbach, W., Pathological Role of Angiotensin II in Severe COVID-19. TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2020. 4(2): p. e138.
117.Rysz, S., et al., COVID-19 pathophysiology may be driven by a loss of inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square, 2020.
118.Alenina, N. and M. Bader, ACE2 in brain physiology and pathophysiology: Evidence from transgenic animal models.
Neurochemical research, 2019. 44(6): p.1323-1329.
119.Liu, Y., et al., Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Science China Life Sciences, 2020. 63(3): p. 364-374.
120.Wu, Z., et al., Elevation of plasma angiotensin II level is a potential pathogenesis for the critically ill COVID-19
patients. Critical Care, 2020. 24(1): p. 1-3.
121.Speth, R.C., Angiotensin II administration to COVID-19 patients is not advisable. Critical Care, 2020. 24(1): p. 1-2.
122.Wilkinson-Berka, J.L., et al., Angiotensin II and aldosterone in retinal vasculopathy and inflammation. Experimental eye research, 2019. 187: p. 107766.
123.Pan, H.-L., Brain angiotensin II and synaptic transmission. The Neuroscientist, 2004. 10(5): p. 422-431.
124.Jackson, L., et al., Within the brain: the renin angiotensin system. International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. 19(3): p.876.
125.Senanayake, P.d., et al., Angiotensin II and its receptor subtypes in the human retina. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2007. 48(7): p. 3301-3311.
126.Landmesser, U., et al., Angiotensin II induces endothelial xanthine oxidase activation: role for endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary disease. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2007. 27(4): p. 943-948.
127.Chrissobolis, S., et al., Role of Nox isoforms in angiotensin II-induced oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in brain. Journal of applied physiology, 2012. 113(2): p. 184-191.
128.Elased, K.M., et al., Brain angiotensin‐converting enzymes: role of angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 in processing
angiotensin II in mice. Experimental physiology, 2008. 93(5): p. 665-675.
129.Xia, H. and E. Lazartigues, Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 in the brain: properties and future directions. Journal of
neurochemistry, 2008. 107(6): p. 1482-1494.
130.Doobay, M.F., et al., Differential expression of neuronal ACE2 in transgenic mice with overexpression of the brain reninangiotensin system. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 2007. 292(1): p.R373-R381.
131.Leenen, F.H., Actions of circulating angiotensin II and aldosterone in the brain contributing to hypertension. American journal of hypertension, 2014. 27(8): p. 1024-1032.
132.Görlach, A., et al., Calcium and ROS: a mutual interplay. Redox biology, 2015. 6: p.260-271.
133.Shah, V.N., B. Chagot, and W.J. Chazin, Calcium-dependent regulation of ion channels. Calcium binding proteins, 2006.1(4): p. 203.
134.Bourassa, E.A. and R.C. Speth, Longitudinal analysis of AT-1 angiotensin receptor binding in the rostral and caudal
ventrolateral medulla and nucleus of the solitary tract in the rat brainstem. 2008, Federation of American Societies for
Experimental Biology. p. 1169.13.
135.Xu, J., S. Sriramula, and E. Lazartigues, Excessive glutamate stimulation impairs ACE2 activity through ADAM17-mediated shedding in cultured cortical neurons. Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2018. 38(6): p. 1235-1243.
136.Saavedra, J.M., Brain angiotensin II: new developments, unanswered questions and therapeutic opportunities. Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2005. 25(3-4): p.485-512.
137.Kramár, E.A., J.W. Harding, and J.W. Wright, Angiotensin II-and IV-induced changes in cerebral blood flow: Roles of AT1AT2, and AT4 receptor subtypes. Regulatory peptides, 1997. 68(2): p. 131-138.
138.Phipps, J.A., et al., The reninangiotensin system and the retinal neurovascular unit: A role in vascular regulation and disease. Experimental Eye Research, 2019. 187: p. 107753.
139.Kurihara, T., et al., Renin-Angiotensin system hyperactivation can induce inflammation and retinal neural dysfunction. International journal of inflammation, 2012.2012.
140.Jain, R., et al., COVID-19 related neuroimaging findings: A signal of thromboembolic complications and a strong
prognostic marker of poor patient outcome. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 2020:p. 116923.
141.Akimoto, T., et al., Erythropoietin modulates angiotensin II‐or noradrenaline‐ induced Ca2+ mobilization in cultured rat vascular smooth‐muscle cells. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2001. 16(3): p.491-499.
142.Assandri, R., et al., Erythropoietin modulates intracellular calcium in a human neuroblastoma cell line. The Journal of
physiology, 1999. 516(Pt 2): p. 343.
143.Liu, Y., et al., Erythropoietin increases expression and function of transient receptor potential canonical 5 channels. Hypertension, 2011. 58(2): p. 317-324.
144.Harr, M.W. and C.W. Distelhorst, Apoptosis and autophagy: decoding calcium signals that mediate life or death. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. 2(10): p. a005579.
145.Bollimuntha, S., S. Selvaraj, and B.B. Singh, Emerging roles of canonical TRP channels in neuronal function, in Transient Receptor Potential Channels. 2011, Springer. p. 573-593.
146.Sama, D.M. and C.M. Norris, Calcium dysregulation and neuroinflammation: discrete and integrated mechanisms for agerelated synaptic dysfunction. Ageing research reviews, 2013. 12(4): p. 982-995.
147.Mizoguchi, Y. and A. Monji, Microglial intracellular Ca2+ signaling in synaptic development and its alterations in
neurodevelopmental disorders. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 2017. 11: p. 69.
148.Tilleux, S. and E. Hermans, Neuroinflammation and regulation of glial glutamate uptake in neurological disorders.
Journal of neuroscience research, 2007. 85(10): p. 2059-2070.
149.Magi, S., et al., Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs): Glutamate transport and beyond. International journal of
molecular sciences, 2019. 20(22): p. 5674.
150.Justin, A., S. Divakar, and M. Ramanathan, Cerebral ischemia induced inflammatory response and altered
glutaminergic function mediated through brain AT1 and not AT2 receptor. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2018. 102:
p. 947-958.
151.Stern, J.E., et al., Astrocytes contribute to angiotensin II stimulation of hypothalamic neuronal activity and sympathetic outflow.Hypertension, 2016. 68(6): p. 1483-1493.
152.Andoh, T., et al., Effects of erythropoietin on intracellular calcium concentration of rat primary cortical neurons.
Brain research, 2011. 1387: p. 8-18.
153.Gebke, E., et al., Angiotensin II-induced calcium signalling in neurons and astrocytes of rat circumventricular organs.
Neuroscience, 1998. 85(2): p. 509-520.
154.Zimmerman, M.C., R.V. Sharma, and R.L. Davisson, Superoxide mediates angiotensin II–induced influx of extracellular
calcium in neural cells. Hypertension, 2005.
45(4): p. 717-723.
155.Calò, L.A., et al., Assessing the relationship of angiotensin II Type 1receptors with erythropoietin in a human
model of endogenous angiotensin II Type 1receptor antagonism. Cardiorenal medicine, 2016. 6(1): p. 16-24.
156.Gossmann, J., et al., Angiotensin II infusion increases plasma erythropoietin levels via an angiotensin II type 1 receptor dependent pathway. Kidney international, 2001. 60(1): p. 83-86.
157.Diebold, I., et al., The NADPH oxidase subunit NOX4 is a new target gene of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Molecular biology of the cell, 2010. 21(12): p. 2087-2096.
158.Li, Z., et al., Identification of a deubiquitinating enzyme subfamily as substrates of the von Hippel–Lindau tumor
suppressor. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2002. 294(3): p.700-709.
159.Wolf, G., R. Schroeder, and R.A. Stahl, Angiotensin II induces hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in PC 12 cells through a
posttranscriptional mechanism: role of AT2 receptors. American journal of nephrology, 2004. 24(4): p. 415-421.
160.Nanduri, J., et al., HIF-1α activation by intermittent hypoxia requires NADPH oxidase stimulation by xanthine oxidase. PloS one, 2015. 10(3): p. e0119762.
161.Garrido, A.M. and K.K. Griendling, NADPH oxidases and angiotensin II receptor signaling. Molecular and cellular
endocrinology, 2009. 302(2): p. 148-158.
162.Imtiyaz, H.Z. and M.C. Simon, Hypoxiainducible factors as essential regulators of inflammation, in Diverse Effects of Hypoxia on Tumor Progression. 2010, Springer. p.105-120.
163.Kim, Y.-C., et al., Mechanism of erythropoietin regulation by angiotensin II. Molecular pharmacology, 2014. 85(6): p.
898-908.
164.Haase, V.H., Regulation of erythropoiesis by hypoxia-inducible factors. Blood reviews, 2013. 27(1): p. 41-53.
165.Nejat, R. and A.S. Sadr, SARS Virus
Papain-like Protease: A Mysterious Weapon. Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 2019. 5(4): p. 288-295.
166.Freitas, B.T., et al., Characterization and noncovalent inhibition of the deubiquitinase and deISGylase activity of SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease. ACS Infectious Diseases, 2020. 6(8): p. 2099-2109.
167.Clemente, V., P. D’Arcy, and M. Bazzaro, Deubiquitinating Enzymes in Coronaviruses and Possible Therapeutic
Opportunities for COVID-19. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020. 21(10):p. 3492.
168.Lindner, H.A., Deubiquitination in virus infection. Virology, 2007. 362(2): p. 245-256.
169.Faure, S., et al., Synergistic protective effects of erythropoietin and olmesartan on ischemic stroke survival and post-stroke memory dysfunctions in the gerbil. Journal of hypertension, 2006. 24(11): p. 2255-2261.
170.Mori, F., et al., Inhibitory effect of losartan, an AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on increased leucocyte
entrapment in retinal microcirculation of diabetic rats. British journal of ophthalmology, 2002. 86(10): p. 1172-1174.
171.Fukuda, K., et al., Neuroprotection against retinal ischemia–reperfusion injury by blocking the angiotensin II type 1
receptor. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010. 51(7): p. 3629-3638.
172.Souza, J.B.d., et al., Evaluation of the losartan solubility in the biowaiver context by shake-flask method and intrinsic
dissolution. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 2019. 24(3): p. 283-292.
173.Shakeel, F., et al., Measurement and correlation of solubility of olmesartan medoxomil in six green solvents at 295.15–330.15 K. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014. 53(7): p. 2846-2849.
174.Oparil, S., et al., Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential
hypertension. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 2001. 3(5): p. 283-318.
Files
IssueVol 6 No 2 (2020) QRcode
SectionReview Article(s)
Published2020-12-13
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v6i2.4879
Keywords
COVID -19; SARS-CoV2; Calcium; Neuroinflammation; Erythropoietin; Ang II; HIF; papain-like protease; excitotoxicity

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Nejat R, Sadr AS, Najafi D. Erythropoietin in COVID-19-Induced Neuroinflammation; EPO Plus Losartan Might be Promising. jbe. 2020;6(2):143-161.