Characterization and Determinants of the Utilization of Family Planning Services
Abstract
Background: Family planning is a vital aspect of reproductive health, encompassing contraceptive use, pregnancy, and STI prevention. Among Palestinian refugees in Jordan, particularly those utilizing UNRWA services, maternal mortality rates and contraceptive utilization highlight the urgent need to address gaps in family planning access. Sociocultural factors and service barriers remain determinants of contraceptive use and family planning outcomes in this population.
Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted from June 5–7, 2023, at the Marka health center in Jordan. The study involved structured interviews with 57 female patients, focus group discussions (FGDs), and semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers. Data collection explored sociodemographic factors, perceptions of family planning services, and sociocultural determinants influencing contraceptive use. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to identify themes related to family planning knowledge, access, and utilization.
Results: Three major themes were determined: (1) Knowledge and access to family planning methods varied, with 59.6% of participants reporting contraceptive use. The most common methods included condoms (37.8%) and birth control pills (29.7%). (2) Sociocultural factors significantly shaped decisions, with 37.8% citing spousal preferences and 10.5% reporting pressure from extended family. (3) Perceptions of UNRWA’s services were largely positive, with 63% rating them adequate, although logistical challenges like long wait times hindered utilization. Younger women aged 18–29 formed most participants, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. Most participants were housewives, with limited employment and varying educational levels.
Conclusions: While UNRWA’s family planning services are well-regarded, persistent barriers such as sociocultural constraints, limited knowledge, and service accessibility require targeted interventions. Addressing misconceptions, fostering supportive sociocultural environments, and improving logistical factors like wait times can enhance service uptake. Future research should explore long-term impacts of family planning initiatives and expand the scope to include other refugee populations to inform inclusive, effective health policies.
1. Association A. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dementia 2018; 14 (3): 367–
429.
2. Korolev, I.O., 2014. Alzheimer’s disease: a clinical and basic science review. Med. Student Res.
J. 4 (1), 24–33.
3. Moon SW, Lee B, Choi YC. Changes in the hippocampal volume and shape in early-onset mild
cognitive impairment. Psychiatry Invest 2018; 15 (5): 531–537.
4. Brody H. Medical imaging. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013; 502, S81.
5. Yousaf T; Dervenoulas G; Politis M. Chapter Two-Advances in MRI Methodology. In International
Review of Neurobiology; Politis, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA 2018; 141:
31–76.
6. Akhavan Aghdam M; Sharifi A; Pedram MM. Combination of rs-fMRI and sMRI Data to
Discriminate Autism Spectrum Disorders in Young Children Using Deep Belief Network. J. Digit
Imaging 2018; 31: 895–903.
7. Sarraf S, Tofighi G, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. DeepAD: Alzheimer's disease
classification via deep convolutional neural networks using MRI and fMRI. BioRxiv. 2016;
1:070441.
8. Parmar HS, Nutter B, Long R, Antani S, Mitra S. Deep learning of volumetric 3D CNN for fMRI
in Alzheimer's disease classification. InMedical Imaging. Biomedical Applications in Molecular,
Structural, and Functional Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics.2020; 11317:
113170C.
9. Currie G, Hawk KE, Rohren E, Vial A, Klein R. Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Medical
Imaging: Intelligent Imaging. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 2019; 50: 477–487.
10. Duc NT, Ryu S, Qureshi MN, Choi M, Lee KH, Lee B. 3D-deep learning based automatic diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with joint MMSE prediction using resting-state fMRI. Neuroinformatics.
2020;18(1):71-86.
11. Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, Kline TL. Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.
Radiographics 2017; 37: 505–515.
12. Liu S, Liu S, Cai W, Pujol S, Kikinis R, Feng D. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with
deep learning. In2014 IEEE 11th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) 2014;
29: 1015-1018.
13. Wang SH, Phillips P, Sui Y, Liu B, Yang M, Cheng H. Classification of Alzheimer's disease based
on eight-layer convolutional neural network with leaky rectified linear unit and max pooling.
Journal of medical systems. 2018; 42(5): 1-1.
14. Ramzan F, Khan MU, Rehmat A, Iqbal S, Saba T, Rehman A, Mehmood Z. A deep learning approach
for automated diagnosis and multi-class classification of Alzheimer's disease stages using restingstate fMRI and residual neural networks. Journal of medical systems. 2020; 44(2):1-6.
15. Suk HI, Lee SW, Shen D, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Hierarchical feature
representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. NeuroImage.
2014; 101:569-82.
16. ADNI. Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative: ADNI. http://adni.loni.usc. edu/datasamples/access-data, accessed: 2020-07-13.
17. Kam TE, Zhang H, Shen D. A Novel Deep Learning Framework on Brain Functional Networks
for Early MCI Diagnosis. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—
MICCAI 2018; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; 11072:
293–301.
18. Zheng Y, Guo H, Zhang L, Wu J, Li Q, Lv F. Machine Learning-Based Framework for Differential
Diagnosis Between Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease Using Structural MRI Features.
Front. Neurol. 2019; 10.
19. Khanna A, Tanwar S, Rodrigues JJ, Roy NR. Alzheimer detection using Group Grey Wolf
Optimization based features with convolutional classifier. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2019; 77: 230–
243.
20. Amini M, Pedram M, Moradi A, Ouchani M. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Severity with
fMRI Images Using Robust Multitask Feature Extraction Method and Convolutional Neural
Network (CNN). Comput. Math. Methods Med 202;1: 1–15
21. Al-Khuzaie FE, Bayat O, Duru AD. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease Using 2D MRI Slices by
Convolutional Neural Network. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics. 2021; 2:2021.
22. Acharya UR, Fernandes SL, WeiKoh JE. Automated Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Brain
MRI Images– A Study with Various Feature Extraction Techniques. J Med Syst 2019; 43: 30.
23. Dyrba M, Grothe M, Kirste T, Teipel SJ. Multimodal analysis of functional and structural
disconnection in Alzheimer's disease using multiple kernel SVM. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36:
2118-2131.
24. Dai Z, Yan C, Wang Z, Wang J, Xia M, Li K, He Y. Discriminative analysis of early Alzheimer's
disease using multi-modal imaging and multi-level characterization with multi-classifier (M3).
Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2187-2195.
25. Silva IRR, Silva GSL, de Souza RG, dos Santos WP, Fagundes RA. "Model Based on Deep
Feature Extraction for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease," 2019 International Joint Conference
on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary 2019; 1-7
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 11 No 2 (2025) | |
| Section | Articles | |
| Keywords | ||
| Family Planning Women’s Health Jordan Refugee Health Epidemiology | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |

