Robust inference to parameter estimates in the zero-inflated generalized Poisson: The risk factors affecting the fertility rate
Robust inference to parameter estimates in the zero-inflated generalized Poisson: The risk factors affecting the fertility rate
,
Abstract
Introduction: Fertility data frequently exhibit excess zeros, overdispersion, and within-cluster correlation, rendering conventional count models inadequate.
Methods: We propose a multilevel zero-inflated generalized Poisson (ZIGP) model based on the Robust Expectation Solution (RES) algorithm. The model comprises two components: (i) a logistic component to model the probability of structural zeros and (ii) a generalized Poisson component for count responses. Random intercepts at the city and cluster levels account for the hierarchical data structure. All algorithms were implemented by the authors through original programming in R (version 4.3.1), without reliance on pre-existing packages, ensuring flexibility and transparency. Robust estimation employs Huber’s ψ-function and Mallows-type weights to mitigate sensitivity to contamination and outliers.
Results: Simulation studies across various contamination scenarios demonstrated that the robust multilevel ZIGP model yields more stable parameter estimates, with approximately 45% lower bias and 38% lower mean squared error compared to conventional estimators. Model fit criteria (AIC and BIC, unitless) confirmed the superior performance of the proposed model.
Conclusion: The robust multilevel ZIGP model provides a practical and reliable framework for analyzing clustered count data with excess zeros, particularly under contamination. The original R implementation ensures reproducibility and adaptability for biostatistical and epidemiological applications. Application to real fertility data from Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran, showed significant zero-inflation and overdispersion, and identified age at marriage, education, and income as factors associated with fertility.
2. Famoye F, Wulu JT, Singh KP. On the generalized Poisson regression model with an application to accident data. J Data Sci. 2004;2(3):287–295.
3. Zamani H, Ismail N. Functional form for the generalized Poisson regression model. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2012;41(20):3666–3675.
4. Famoye F, Singh KP. Zero-inflated generalized Poisson regression model with an application to domestic violence data. J Data Sci. 2006;4(1):117–130.
5. Zandkarimi E, Moghimbeigi A, Mahjoub H, Majdzadeh R. Robust inference in the multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial model. Journal of Applied Statistics. 2023;50(4):123–135.
6. Hall DB, Shen J. Robust estimation for zero-inflated Poisson regression. Scand J Stat. 2010;37(2):237–252.
7. Hosseinian S. Robust inference for generalized linear models: binary and Poisson regression. [dissertation]. Verlag nicht ermittelbar; 2009.
8. Almasi A, Eshraghian MR, Moghimbeigi A, Rahimi A, Mohammad K, Fallahigilan S. Multilevel Zandkarimi E et al. Robust Inference to Parameter Estimates in the Zero-Inflated Generalized Poisson: The Risk Factors ...zero-inflated generalized Poisson regression modeling for dispersed correlated count data. Stat Methodol. 2016;30:1–14.
9. Lambert D. Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics. 1992;34(1):1–14.
10. Zandkarimi E, Moghimbeigi A, Mahjub H. Robust inference in the joint modeling of multilevel zero‐inflated Poisson and Cox models. Stat Med. 2020;40(4):933–949.
11. Bianco AM, Yohai VJ. Robust estimation in the logistic regression model. In: Stromberg A, Wold H, editors. Robust Statistics, Data Analysis, and Computer Intensive Methods. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1996. p. 17–34.
12. Kabir A, Jahan G. Female age at marriage as a determinant of fertility. 2001.
13.Acharya AK. The influence of female age at marriage on fertility and child loss in India. Trayectorias. 2010;12(31):61–80.
14. Van De Walle E. Age at marriage and fertility (Implications for family planning). IPPF Med Bull. 1973;7(3):1–2.
15. Hanson SL, Sloane DM. Young children and job satisfaction. J Marriage Fam. 1992;54(4):799–811.
16. Matysiak A, Vignoli D. Diverse effects of women’s employment on fertility: Insights from Italy and Poland. Eur J Popul. 2013;29(3):273–302.
17. Behrman J, Gonalons-Pons P. Women’s employment and fertility in a global perspective (1960 2015). Demogr Res. 2020;43:707–744.
18.Beatty A. Recent fertility trends in sub-Saharan Africa: workshop summary. Presented at: Recent Fertility Trends in Sub-Saharan Africa: Workshop Summary; 2016.
19. Leridon H. Demographic effects of the introduction of steroid contraception in developed countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(5):603–616.
20.Yau KK, Wang K, Lee AH. Zero-inflated negative binomial mixed regression modeling of over dispersed count data with extra zeros. Biom J. 2003;45(4):437–452.
21. Lee AH, Wang K, Scott JA, Yau KK, McLachlan GJ. Multi-level zero-inflated Poisson regression modelling of correlated count data with excess zeros. Stat Methods Med Res. 2006;15(1):47–61.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 11 No 4 (2025) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v11i4.22518 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Robust inference Fertility Over dispersion Outliers Zero inflated models | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
